<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Broadband Salad Bar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scottjberry.com/2008/03/27/the-broadband-salad-bar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scottjberry.com/2008/03/27/the-broadband-salad-bar/</link>
	<description>Comments on Digital Media, small cap tech stocks, internet, telecom.  And the kitchen sink.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:45:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Up And Down Vote &#171; Digitalics</title>
		<link>http://scottjberry.com/2008/03/27/the-broadband-salad-bar/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Up And Down Vote &#171; Digitalics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottjberry.com/2008/03/27/the-broadband-salad-bar/#comment-89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in trying to charge consumers more money for Internet access, especially as they&#8217;ve been billing flat rates for so long. But we will all pay, one way or [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in trying to charge consumers more money for Internet access, especially as they&#8217;ve been billing flat rates for so long. But we will all pay, one way or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: broadbandDude</title>
		<link>http://scottjberry.com/2008/03/27/the-broadband-salad-bar/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[broadbandDude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottjberry.com/2008/03/27/the-broadband-salad-bar/#comment-86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[well you could always move to asia where there are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.highspeedinternetproviders.com.au/?c=7&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;no download limits&lt;/a&gt; and much faster speeds!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well you could always move to asia where there are <a href="http://www.highspeedinternetproviders.com.au/?c=7" rel="nofollow">no download limits</a> and much faster speeds!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C&#8217;mon In, the Water&#8217;s Fine &#171; Digitalics</title>
		<link>http://scottjberry.com/2008/03/27/the-broadband-salad-bar/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[C&#8217;mon In, the Water&#8217;s Fine &#171; Digitalics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottjberry.com/2008/03/27/the-broadband-salad-bar/#comment-67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I know that sell you a service and then try to limit how much of it you can use. As I blogged some months ago, the reason is largely due to the fiction of unlimited usage banging up against the reality of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I know that sell you a service and then try to limit how much of it you can use. As I blogged some months ago, the reason is largely due to the fiction of unlimited usage banging up against the reality of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Waders Needed &#171; Digitalics</title>
		<link>http://scottjberry.com/2008/03/27/the-broadband-salad-bar/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[No Waders Needed &#171; Digitalics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottjberry.com/2008/03/27/the-broadband-salad-bar/#comment-13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 15, 2008   I&#8217;ve commented before, here and also here, about P2P traffic, net neutrality, and broadband [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 15, 2008   I&#8217;ve commented before, here and also here, about P2P traffic, net neutrality, and broadband [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Berry</title>
		<link>http://scottjberry.com/2008/03/27/the-broadband-salad-bar/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Berry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottjberry.com/2008/03/27/the-broadband-salad-bar/#comment-3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Competition.  Aye, there&#039;s the rub.  If there was any, everyone would have rushed to put in more capacity.  Especially if they saw themselves as being solely in the pipes business.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;These guys are the only industry I know where they promote use of the service and then restrict how much you can use.  Silly, really.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Only Verizon seems to have fully understood the game--first fiber to the home wins.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;(Back in my Metromedia Fiber days, there were plenty of stories about Verizon techs sabotaging other carriers&#039; fiber runs in NY subway conduits.  I suspect they weren&#039;t the only ones who got &quot;careless&quot; with other people&#039;s cables.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Competition.  Aye, there&#8217;s the rub.  If there was any, everyone would have rushed to put in more capacity.  Especially if they saw themselves as being solely in the pipes business.</p>
<p>These guys are the only industry I know where they promote use of the service and then restrict how much you can use.  Silly, really.</p>
<p>Only Verizon seems to have fully understood the game&#8211;first fiber to the home wins.</p>
<p>(Back in my Metromedia Fiber days, there were plenty of stories about Verizon techs sabotaging other carriers&#8217; fiber runs in NY subway conduits.  I suspect they weren&#8217;t the only ones who got &#8220;careless&#8221; with other people&#8217;s cables.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davis Freeberg</title>
		<link>http://scottjberry.com/2008/03/27/the-broadband-salad-bar/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davis Freeberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottjberry.com/2008/03/27/the-broadband-salad-bar/#comment-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comcast could have put in fiber as well, but they&#039;ve always been too worried about the the market&#039;s reaction to their capital expenditures.  Verizon at least bit the bullet and took the time to put in a system that wouldn&#039;t be constrained by too many video bytes.  It wasn&#039;t nice for their shareholders at the time, but they should be sitting pretty now that they&#039;ve spent the money.  If we didn&#039;t have the bogus franchise rules, Comcast wouldn&#039;t have been able to get away with throttling the traffic to begin with.  I remember when consumers were still jumping off of dial-up and Comcast used Bit Torrent as a carrot for people to upgrade to the faster service.  Now it&#039;s telco&#039;s turn to use this tactic on the incumbents.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Until we can open up the local franchises to competition though, we&#039;ll still be at the mercy of the cable companies.  In Alameda, they have a government run cable provider that competes with Comcast and not only do they not throttle, but they charge less than Comcast as well.  In fact, because of the competition, Comcast offers a package that is $10 less per month, then the rest of the Bay Area.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It was pretty cool while I lived there and I got to know a lot of the Alameda employees.  They told me there was real bad blood over their competition and that Comcast tech guys would slash their cables all the time.  I think Comcast even had to pay a fine because they slammed about 10% of Alameda&#039;s customers during the summer that I lived there.  One day I&#039;m supporting the local government and the next, I was receiving Comcast cable without every giving any authorization.  At first I thought Alameda went under and sold it off to Comcast.  It was really bizarre when it happened, I went bonkers.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Even with Alameda&#039;s unthrottled bit-torrenting, it still wasn&#039;t as cool as when I lived at Zooomr&#039;s HQ&#039;s for three months and got to tap into fiber for the first time.  Not only could I download large files in nothing flat, but when I seeded my own videos on Bit Torrent, they spread like wildfire.  I&#039;ve never gotten that kind of exposure with cable or DSL.  I&#039;d pay twice what I&#039;m paying to get access to fiber now, but Comcast locked the rest of the Bay Area into an exclusive deal, so that the local governments could solve short term budget problems.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comcast could have put in fiber as well, but they&#8217;ve always been too worried about the the market&#8217;s reaction to their capital expenditures.  Verizon at least bit the bullet and took the time to put in a system that wouldn&#8217;t be constrained by too many video bytes.  It wasn&#8217;t nice for their shareholders at the time, but they should be sitting pretty now that they&#8217;ve spent the money.  If we didn&#8217;t have the bogus franchise rules, Comcast wouldn&#8217;t have been able to get away with throttling the traffic to begin with.  I remember when consumers were still jumping off of dial-up and Comcast used Bit Torrent as a carrot for people to upgrade to the faster service.  Now it&#8217;s telco&#8217;s turn to use this tactic on the incumbents.  </p>
<p>Until we can open up the local franchises to competition though, we&#8217;ll still be at the mercy of the cable companies.  In Alameda, they have a government run cable provider that competes with Comcast and not only do they not throttle, but they charge less than Comcast as well.  In fact, because of the competition, Comcast offers a package that is $10 less per month, then the rest of the Bay Area.  </p>
<p>It was pretty cool while I lived there and I got to know a lot of the Alameda employees.  They told me there was real bad blood over their competition and that Comcast tech guys would slash their cables all the time.  I think Comcast even had to pay a fine because they slammed about 10% of Alameda&#8217;s customers during the summer that I lived there.  One day I&#8217;m supporting the local government and the next, I was receiving Comcast cable without every giving any authorization.  At first I thought Alameda went under and sold it off to Comcast.  It was really bizarre when it happened, I went bonkers.</p>
<p>Even with Alameda&#8217;s unthrottled bit-torrenting, it still wasn&#8217;t as cool as when I lived at Zooomr&#8217;s HQ&#8217;s for three months and got to tap into fiber for the first time.  Not only could I download large files in nothing flat, but when I seeded my own videos on Bit Torrent, they spread like wildfire.  I&#8217;ve never gotten that kind of exposure with cable or DSL.  I&#8217;d pay twice what I&#8217;m paying to get access to fiber now, but Comcast locked the rest of the Bay Area into an exclusive deal, so that the local governments could solve short term budget problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

